A Dead Heat Election – UNCERTAINTY ?

Investor’s first read – Daily edge before the open
DJIA: 18,491
S&P 500:2,179
Nasdaq Comp.:5,249
Russell 2000: 1,251
Tuesday, September 6, 2016 9:12 a.m.
-First presidential debate Sept. 26
-Strength in the U.S. dollar will make it more difficult for multinationals to post good earnings over coming quarters potentially adversely impacting S&P 500 earnings, a basis for overall market valuation.
-September is historically the worst month of the year for stocks.
-The European Central Bank meets on Sept. 8 and the Bank of England on Sept. 15.
-FOMC releases decision on rates at 2:00 p.m. Sept. 21 followed by a press conference at 2:30.
-OPEC meets on Sept. 26-28
While the Street is Fed-focused, the following deserves respect.
There is a chance the presidential polls will show a dead heat this month between Clinton and Trump with the possibility that the Libertarian ticket (Johnson/Weld) could act as a the swing factor in several key states, Ohio for one.
If this happens it would inject major uncertainty into the market with the potential of a plunge in prices, and there would be little the Fed can do to stop it.
Not yet considered by the Street is how good is the estimate for a 13% increase in S&P 500 earnings in 2017 ?
Q2 earnings were down 3.2%, the fifth straight quarterly decline, much of it due to the crunch in energy industry earnings. Q3 is projected to mark the sixth straight decline in quarterly earnings with a drop of 2.1%, but Q5 is projected to increase 5.5%.
Oil prices have been falling, which stands to impact earnings of oil and related stocks. The U.S. dollar is strong and can get stronger if the Fed raises interest rates, which will impact multinational stock earnings. The reverse is true if oil prices rebound as a result of OPEC’s meeting, and the dollar weakens if the Fed opts out of a rate increase – stay tuned.
August manufacturing took another hit with the ISM Index slipping to 49.4 from 52 (50 is the growth/no growth threshold).
Labor costs are up while worker productivity is in its longest slide since the 1970s, crunching margins.
What could go wrong is what every investor should always bear in mind, just in case enough of those negatives develop.
But markets tend to persist in a state of vulnerability until something triggers a break. In the meantime, markets can rise fueled by momentum and investors ramping up to a fully invested position.
The major ignored issue now is the election. The Street gave every impression it was far more comfortable when Hillary Clinton had a huge lead in the polls, since she was less of an unknown. Whatever selling occurred due to that lead was quickly absorbed and “to-date,” the market hovers close to its all-time highs.
Bus suddenly, the race is a dead, almost overnight. That spells UNCERTAINTY. Add Johnson/Weld’s 8% – 11% bite and you have compounded uncertainty.
The differences between Clinton and Donald Trump are significant enough to warrant serious second thoughts about being fully invested with a market carrying baggage and selling at all-time highs.
It matters little, who you favor, uncertainty is just that, are you willing to roll the dice ?
Without this new development, I would say odds favor a rise to new all-time highs driven by expectations that the Fed may not raise rates on the 21st after a mediocre jobs report.
When it comes down to a jousting contest between the Fed and a close election, I think the latter has greater impact.
SUPPORT “today”: DJIA:18,391; S&P 500:2,169; Nasdaq Comp.:5,221
RESISTANCE “today”: DJIA:18,586; S&P 500:2,187; Nasdaq Comp.:5,269
The risk for over-reliance on Fed policy and low interest rates is that it forces investors to seek riskier and riskier stock and bond investments, which will ultimately result in a bubble burst.
We had bubble bursts in January 2000 with dot-coms, and again in 2008 with housing/derivatives. The next one could be the Fed bubble burst when investors get over extended in speculative issues only to find nothing the Fed can do, not even negative rates, can avert and soften the impact of an ugly recession.
Ms Yellen referred to the Fed’s toolkit in her Jackson Hole speech ( Interest on reserves, forward guidance and asset purchases), the implication being the Fed can use these to control future economic cycles. Lot’s of Luck, Ms Yellen.
That event can be months or a year out. Just be aware it can happen, because there will be little warning ahead of time. Prior to that, some nice money can be made, so long as investors watch their back.
Obviously the Fed can only do so much with its lo interest rate policy. What is needed is fiscal spending. Competing for funds will be the military and infrastructure needs ( roads, bridges, tunnels, water and sewage piping, the electronic grid, airports, government and school buildings, dams and waterways, harbors).

On occasion, I technically analyze each of the 30 DJIA stocks for a reasonable risk, a more extreme risk, and an upside potential over the near-term. I add the results of each, then divide by the new DJIA “divisor” (0.14602) to get the DJIA for those levels. This gives me an internal check on the DJIA itself, especially if certain higher priced stocks are distorting the averages.
As of September 2, 2016, a reasonable risk is 17,582 a more extreme risk is 17,353 Near-term upside potential is 18,753.
This market has defied anything I have ever seen EXCEPT that is, near market tops.
News headlines of new all-time highs attracts interest especially from investors who have not participated in this bull market. Likewise, it is forcing investment professionals (brokers, money managers, hedge funds and newsletter writers) to become more fully invested.
It is characteristic of late bull market behavior to prompt talk of a “New Era.”
I have heard the New Era talk before. It comes on stream when the market hits new highs after a long bull run at a time just about everyone concludes the market simply has to go higher and they better jump on board.
I see fundamental and technical signs that warn of a top, but then I started seeing those three weeks ago. It is a matter of how high is high, and a momentum that is self fulfilling.
Bull markets can reach unthinkable extremes when investors stampede into stocks fearing being left behind.
Then too, fear of total ruin at bear market bottoms can trigger panicky selling as investors scramble to salvage what’s left of a portfolio after a 30% -45% plunge.
Major tops and bottoms are marked by extremes. Savvy investors know this. Even so, it is a challenge for any human to resist the urge to chase running stock prices at unreasonable heights, or get chased out after a harrowing plunge in stock prices.
(So far this is not holding up)
The market is tracking a pattern for presidential election years where an administration is in its second term.* The news is bad.
Historically, these markets have declined in Jan./Feb., rallied in March then topped out in early April, plunged in May with brief rallies in June and August and a plunge into October prior to the election.
 STATUS OF MARKET: Neutral – but very, very vulnerable. Expect volatility
 OPPORTUNITY: RISK: Risk high, Profit taking justified.
 CASH RESERVE: 45%. Consider 75% now if tolerance for risk is low.
 KEY FACTORS: Outlook for Q3, and 2016 earnings questionable with strong U.S. dollar.
Note: Source of weekly economic calendar and good recap of indicators: mam.econoday.com.
*Bloomberg.com (Excellent pre-market read)
George Brooks
Investor’s first read
A Game-On Analysis, LLC publication
Investor’s first read, is a Game-On Analysis, LLC publication for which George Brooks is sole owner, manager and writer. Neither Game-On Analysis, LLC, nor George Brooks is registered as an investment advisor. Ideas expressed herein are the opinions of the writer, are for informational purposes, and are not to serve as the sole basis for any investment decision. References to specific securities should not be construed as particularized or as investment advice as recommendations that you or any investors purchase or sell these securities on their own account. Readers are expected to assume full responsibility for conducting their own research pursuant to investment in keeping with their tolerance for risk.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.